Since Plurky has requested that I give the "scientific evidence" that I claim exists for theism (a request that is both fair and logical), I have decided to start a blog series titled "Theism: An Intelligent Worldview" (in case you hadn't already looked at the title). In it, I will hopefully present a good case for why theism is actually a factually sound and logical worldview.
In this series, I will give evidence and arguments that disprove Organic Macroevolution, Cosmic Evolution, and other atheistic theories that explain how the world as it is came to be. This is evidence for theism, because the syllogism:
Either atheism or theism is correct.
Atheism is not correct.
Therefore, theism is correct.
Shows that evidence against atheism (proving the second premise) is logically evidence for theism (proving the conclusion by proving the second premise).
Also, before I go on with this, I just want to say that I have the greatest respect for atheists. Why??? Because being an atheist usually means that one has legitimately studied the evidence for and against what they were taught as children (most people are taught to believe in some form of God), instead of just accepting it as an axiom. That, in my opinion, is highly, highly commendable. I, myself, have done that, and have simply come to a different conclusion than atheists. Thus, I do not think atheists are stupid - I believe that most of them are highly intelligent, but misguided or misinformed.
Another thing: just so that you know that I know what I'm talking about when I give these arguments, here's a list of science books I have read in the last 6 months or so (I'm such a nerd...): The Fabric of the Cosmos, The Hidden Reality, The Little Book of String Theory, The Trouble with Physics, Chemistry for Dummies, String Theory for Dummies, The Complete Idiot's Guide to Einstein, The Death of Evolution, and Scientific American: Collector's 2015 issue - Physics at the Limits.
Anyways, so please read, Plurky, nya, and anyone else who joins this Wiki of Enlightenment and please debate if you disagree with anything I say or think I came to a wrong conclusion or anything like that, because I believe that knowledge and understanding come primarily from evidence and debating.